DEMRI.org Promotes Conscious Citizenship:

The logic behind bias and propaganda in the news media is simple and it is the same the world over. Each society and culture has a unique world view. This colors what they see and how they see it.  News media in the cultures of the world reflect the world view of the culture they write for.  But the truth of what is happening in the world is much more complicated than what appears to be true in any culture. To be a critical reader of the news media in any society, one must come to terms with this truth and read accordingly.  As home for the Maximum Cultural Development (MCD)  framework, the DEMRI promotes Critical thinking as a set of skills to evaluate  and challenge what is commonly accepted in the media and in human thought.

The uncritical mind is unconsciously driven to identify truth in accordance with the following tacit maxims:

•    “It’s true if I believe it.”
•    “It’s true if we believe it.”
•    “It’s true if we want to believe it.”
•    “It’s true if it serves our vested interest to believe it.”

The critical mind consciously seeks the truth in accordance with the following instinct-correcting maxims:

• “I believe it, but it may not be true.”
• “We believe it, but we may be wrong.”
• “We want to believe it, but we may be prejudiced by our desire.”
• “It serves our vested interest to believe it, but our vested interest has nothing to do with the truth.”

Mainstream news coverage in a society operates with the following maxims:

•  “This is how it appears to us from our point of view; therefore, this is the way it is.”
• “These are the facts that support our way of looking at this; therefore, these are the most important facts.”
•  “These countries are friendly to us; therefore, these countries deserve praise.”
•  “These countries are unfriendly to us; therefore, these countries deserve criticism.”
•  “These are the stories most interesting or sensational to our readers; therefore, these are the most important stories in the news.”

Critical readers of the news reverse each of these maxims. This article explains how to do this and thus reduce the influence of bias and propaganda on the mind.

Democracy and the News Media

“Nothing could be more irrational than to give the people power and to withhold from them information, without which power over them can be abused.  A people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.  A nation and government of people without accurate information or the means of acquiring it is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both.”

Democracy can be an effective form of government only to the extent that the public (that rules it in theory) is well-informed about national and international events and can think independently and critically about those events. If the vast majority of citizens do not recognize bias in their nation’s news; if they cannot detect ideology, slant, and spin, if they cannot recognize propaganda when exposed to it, they cannot reasonably determine what media messages have to be supplemented, counter-balanced, or thrown out entirely.  On the one hand, world-wide news sources are increasingly sophisticated in media logic (the art of “persuading” and manipulating large masses of people). This enables them to create an aura of objectivity and “truthfulness” in the news stories they construct. On the other hand, only a small minority of citizens are skilled in recognizing bias and propaganda in the news disseminated in their country.

Only a relatively few are able to detect one-sided portrayals of events or seek out alternative sources of information and opinion to compare to those of their mainstream news media. At present, the overwhelming majority of people in the world, untrained in critical thinking, are at the mercy of the news media in their own country.

Their view of the world, which countries they identify as friends and which as enemies, is determined largely by those media (and the traditional beliefs and conventions of their society).  What then if that media is slanted, or tainted by corporate interests in a world where the media is controlled by such corporations?

This slanted information is not a “plot” or a “conspiracy.” It is simply a matter of educational background and economic reality.  Journalists and news editors are themselves members of a culture (German, French, Mexican, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Indonesian, Russian, Algerian, Nigerian, North American, corporate, etc.). They share a view of the world with their target audience. They share a nationalized sense of history and allegiance, often a religion, and a general belief-system. An Arab editor sees the world different from an Israeli one. A Pakistani editor sees the world different from an Indian one. A Chinese editor sees the world different from an American one.

The same is true of news reporters and other journalists.  What is more, news people work under severe time restrictions (in constructing their stories) and limitations of space (in laying out or presenting their stories). It is hardly surprising that profound differences are reflected in news coverage from nation to nation and culture to culture.  In any case, only those who understand the conditions under which world media operate have a chance of controlling the influence of their national media upon them. Our goal in this publication is to help our readers lay a foundation for transforming the influence of the media on their lives. It is in all of our interests to critically assess, rather than mindlessly accept, news media pronouncements. Our hope is that we can aid readers to become more independent, insightful, and critical in responding to the content of news media messages and stories.